Director Billy Wilder: Don't Worry About Those Nerds In Silicon Valley

Billy Wilder directed some of the greatest films of midcentury, including Double Indemnity, Some Like it Hot, and my personal favorite Wilder film, The Apartment. But Wilder was pretty skeptical of emerging tech, as we can see from this 1986 acceptance speech at the American Film Institute.

The opening of his speech actually sounds like he's about to come out in support of new technological advances in Hollywood:

I've been here for over 50 years — that's more than half a century — and all through those years I've watched Tinseltown vacillate between despair and fear. First it's going to be the sound that will kill us, then it was going to be television, then cable, then pornography, then cassettes, and now that terrifying new word: microchip.

Advertisement

But somehow, Wilder makes a strange turn, interpreting predictions about the future of the movie business as somehow neglecting the people who make the movies. Which, in fairness, is still very much a concern for media creators today.

They tell me that these guys working in the Silicon Valley, they really believe that pretty soon we will not need theaters anymore, nor studios for that matter. We will have (or they will have) invented tiny little screens which you can attach to your steering wheel, or big 20-foot screens on the ceiling of your bedroom. And then someday somebody is going to press a button and send this signal to a satellite which in turn will light up 5 million screens all the way from Albania to Zanzibar. Fantastic, isn't it? All the hardware is there, beautifully programmed, bravo. Except for one little detail... what about the software? What are they going to do on all those screens? Who is going to write it? Who is going to direct it? Who is going to act it?

For all I know, these wise guys are trying right now to supplant the human factor. Microchips that will replace the human brain, and the human heart. Mechanical gadgets that can simulate emotions — dreams, laughter, tears — well, so far they have not succeeded. Not yet anyway. So relax, fellow picture makers, we are not expendable. The fact is, the bigger they get, the more irreplaceable we become. For theirs may be the kingdom, but ours is the power of the glory.

In the end, Wilder seems to come down on the side of believing that many aspects of the old studio system will survive. And Wilder was right in a lot of ways. The rise of YouTube and amateur-made video hasn't completely upended the movie industry.

Hollywood's secret that's hiding in plain sight? Mainstream movies are still an immensely profitable business. Despite last year being much weaker than average for ticket sales, the last decade has seen pretty consistent profits for the major studios.

Advertisement

Wilder's outlook for Hollywood isn't all that different from Roger Ebert's in 1987. The big difference seems to be that Ebert was more welcoming of what technology might do for the movie business.

Share This Story

Get our newsletter

DISCUSSION

softsoaponarope
softsoaponarope

First thing check out Ace in the Hole for the genius that is Wilder.

Secondly he is entirely correct, there are hardly any true creative talent in Hollywood, it is mostly lazy people relying on recycled ideas and computer graphics (i.e. cartoons). Even those directors who supposedly use practical effects (Nolan) rely on cgi for backgrounds and world building. By being able to watch a movie anywhere at any time we are taking away the art of cinema. It is a commodity more than any other time in it's history. It lacks resonance. No longer is there a communal aspect, but a solitary pursuit. While watching at home you (and others you view with ) have a divided attention between screens. We've lost what it means to have a shared viewing experience, that doesn't mean that they still aren't pushing out crap all the time just as they always have, but instead of a shared experience we are all sitting on the crapper by ourselves.