That Time American School Kids Were Given Dog Tags Because of Nukes

Illustration for article titled That Time American School Kids Were Given Dog Tags Because of Nukes

In the early 1950s cities across the U.S. spent hundreds of thousands of dollars outfitting their children with military-style dog tags. Why were we giving kids something that’s usually reserved for people at risk of dying horrifically in the line of duty? Because in the era of duck and cover, kids were on the front lines.


The Soviet Union surprised the U.S. and became a nuclear-equipped superpower when it successfully tested its first atomic bomb on August 29, 1949. Suddenly the world had two ideologically opposed countries with the capability of unleashing unprecedented devastation upon each other. The campaign to mobilize average Americans by normalizing the discussion of collective death (even with children) was under way.

In February of 1952 the city of New York bought 2.5 million dog tags. By April of that year, just about every kid in the city from kindergarten to fourth grade had a tag with their name on it. Kids in many other cities like San Francisco, Seattle, Las Veagas and Philadelphia also got dog tags, allowing for easy identification should the unthinkable occur.

But educators weren’t considering just dog tags to identify the scores of dead and injured children that would result if the cold war suddenly turned hot. They also considered tattoos.

As JoAnne Brown explained in her 1988 paper on civil defense during the cold war, the assistant superintendent of Milwaukee schools raised the possibility of even more bizarre tagging methods. Writing in a 1951 issue of the Journal of the National Education Association, assistant superintendent William M. Lamers laid out their options:

Tattooing is considered occasionally, but generally rejected because of its associations and impermanence in the case of severe burns ... Marking of clothing is more seriously regarded [but] clothing can be destroyed... and is frequently interchanged. Fingerprinting is... regarded by some as an infringement of privacy... Cards are easily worn out, stolen or destroyed.

Did you catch that? Fingerprinting children: a terrible invasion of privacy. Tattooing children: well, the only downside is that the tattoos won’t be legible when all their skin peels off in a nuclear blast.

Somehow I missed that episode of Leave it to Beaver where the Beav gets a tattoo for corpse identification purposes.


(Image source: August 1951 issue of School Executive by way of the June, 1988 issue of The Journal of American History.)


Starlifter -from the year 2014

Yep. In the Air Force we had footprints (think fingerprint of your whole foot) on file, because your boots will often survive a crash, protecting the foot within. Yum.

I have scanned my sons hands on a scanner before, to have a high resolution image available "just in case". Upset Mrs. Starlifter, so I have not done it in a while. I also have some DNA swabs stored away in the back of the freezer.

Now I am depressed at my paranoia. Sigh. Great article. Thanks for sharing.